|
After concluding that the Patient was in a Persistent Vegetative State, the court made declarations that it was no longer in her best interests to continue to receive artificial nutrition and hydration, and that it was lawful and in her best interests for artificial nutrition and hydration to be withdrawn.
Read the full text of the judgment on Bailii Comments are closed.
|
Stay up to date with changes to policy and procedure.
Sign up for our free email alertWe do not share your details with any third parties and you can unsubscribe at any time.
Thank you!You have successfully joined our Court of Protection Hub list. More from Bath PublishingBrowse |
|
This site is published by Bath Publishing Limited
www.bathpublishing.com Manage your email preferences Read the Bath Publishing Privacy Policy |