New case alert: Re S  EWCOP 32
After concluding that the Patient was in a Persistent Vegetative State, the court made declarations that it was no longer in her best interests to continue to receive artificial nutrition and hydration, and that it was lawful and in her best interests for artificial nutrition and hydration to be withdrawn.
Read the full text of the judgment on Bailii
Comments are closed.
Stay up to date with changes to policy and procedure.
Sign up for our free email alert
We do not share your details with any third parties and you can unsubscribe at any time.
More from Bath Publishing
This site is published by Bath Publishing Limited
Manage your email preferences