|
A child age 14 lived in a children's home and it was agreed that he was being deprived of his liberty as opposed to his liberty merely being restricted - when he was well behaved, he could leave the home from time to time for specified periods but overall, he was the subject of continuous supervision and control to a degree which amounted to a deprivation of his liberty. The court granted the local authority permission to invoke the inherent jurisdiction and authorised the child's deprivation of liberty for 3 months.
Read the full text of the judgment on Bailii Comments are closed.
|
Stay up to date with changes to policy and procedure.
Sign up for our free email alertWe do not share your details with any third parties and you can unsubscribe at any time.
More from Bath PublishingBrowse |
RSS Feed
|
This site is published by Bath Publishing Limited
www.bathpublishing.com Manage your email preferences Read the Bath Publishing Privacy Policy |