Court of Protection Hub
  • Home
  • Resources
  • Cases
  • News & Views
  • About the book
  • About & Advertise

News & views

Law Commission recommends DoLs be replaced by Liberty Protection Safeguards  ‘with pressing urgency'

13/3/2017

 
Picture
The Law Commission has published it's consultation report on the operation of DoLS after the Cheshire West case. They were asked to carry out the review  by the Department of Health in 2014 in recognition of the explosion of applications following the decision.

After a public consultation in 2015, the Commission has recommended that the current deprivation of liberty procedure be replaced by Liberty Protection Safeguards. In contrast to DoLS, which simply authorise a ‘deprivation of liberty’, the new safeguards would 

“authorise particular arrangements for a person’s care or treatment insofar as the arrangements give rise to a deprivation of liberty. This is an important difference. It focuses attention at the authorisation stage not simply on the binary question of whether a person should be deprived of their liberty or not, but on the question of the ways in which a person may justifiably be deprived of liberty.”

Importantly, this would cover more than one setting so that a fresh application would be unnecessary for say a planned admission to hospital.

In total the Commission makes 44 recommendations and they are set out in Appendix C of the report. They are summarised in the accompanying press release broadly as follows:
  • enhanced rights to advocacy and periodic checks on the care or treatment arrangements for those most in need
  • greater prominence given to issues of the person’s human rights, and of whether a deprivation of their liberty is necessary and proportionate, at the stage at which arrangements are being devised
  • extending protections to all care settings such as supported living and domestic settings –therefore removing the need for costly and impractical applications to the Court of Protection
  • widening the scope to cover 16 and 17 year olds and planned moves between settings
  • cutting unnecessary duplication by taking into account previous assessments, enabling authorisations to cover more than one setting and allowing renewals for those with long-term conditions
  • extending who is responsible for giving authorisations from councils to the NHS if in a hospital or NHS health care setting
  • a simplified version of the best interests assessment which emphasises that, in all cases, arrangements must be necessary and proportionate before they can be authorised
  • recommends a wider set of reforms which would improve decision-making across the Mental Capacity Act. This is not just in relation to people deprived of liberty
  • all decision makers would be required to place greater weight on the person’s wishes and feelings when making decisions under the Act
  • professionals would also be expected to confirm in writing that they have complied with the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act when making important decisions – such as moving a person into a care home or providing serious medical treatment
Nicholas Paines, the Law Commissioner responsible for the project, states in the press release that the current DoLS procedure needs to “be scrapped and replaced right away” but no definitive timetable is set out while the Government’s response is awaited. 

A draft Mental Capacity (Amendment) Bill can be found in Appendix A.

You can read the full report on the DoH website here  and the accompanying press release here.


Comments are closed.
    Stay up to date with changes to policy and procedure.

    Sign up for our free email alert

    We do not share your details with any third parties and you can unsubscribe at any time.

    RSS Feed


    More from Bath Publishing






    Browse

    Categories

    All
    Best Interests
    Capacity
    Committal Order
    Compensation
    Costs
    Deputies
    DoLS
    End Of Life Decisions
    Finance
    Human Rights
    Jurisdiction
    Liberty Protection Safeguards
    LPAs
    Lps
    Medical Treatment
    Mental Health Act
    Official Solicitor
    OPG
    Powers Of Attorney
    Procedure
    Public Funding
    Reporting
    Statutory Will
    Training
    Treatment
    Trustees
    Welfare


    Archives

    February 2025
    October 2024
    September 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    September 2023
    June 2023
    April 2023
    February 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    June 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    December 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    September 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015




Picture
This site is published by Bath Publishing Limited
www.bathpublishing.com
Manage your email preferences
Read the Bath Publishing Privacy Policy
  • Home
  • Resources
  • Cases
  • News & Views
  • About the book
  • About & Advertise