The LA considered that the P lacked the capacity to make decisions about contraception and, in view of her obstetric history and current presentation, her treating team considered that it was in the P's best interests to have an intrauterine contraceptive device inserted at the time of her caesarean section in order both to reduce the risk of an unplanned future pregnancy and to enable family spacing. The court made the order sought. The P has a rare chromosomal abnormality syndrome, known as "chromosome 17q12 microdeletion", as a consequence of which she suffers from cognitive impairment and a bicornate (or heart-shaped) uterus. At the time of hearing the P was 35 weeks pregnant with her fifth child. In view of her obstetric history and current presentation, the P was an extremely high-risk individual where any future pregnancy would carry with it a significant risk to her and her baby's health. The LA applied to have an intrauterine contraceptive device inserted at the time of her caesarean section.
The court made the order sought, concluding that the P lacks capacity to make decisions about contraception and that it is in her best interests to have an intrauterine contraceptive device inserted at the time of her caesarean section. Read the full text of the judgment on Bailii Comments are closed.
|
Case summaries on every Court of Protection case & other relevant decisions with links to the full judgment where available.
Support the Hub
This site is free to access but if you find it useful then please consider a contribution by way of support for our work. Click here to contribute. Sign up for our free email alertWe do not share your details with any third parties and you can unsubscribe at any time
More from Bath PublishingBrowseCategories
All
Archives
February 2024
|
This site is published by Bath Publishing Limited
www.bathpublishing.com Manage your email preferences Read the Bath Publishing Privacy Policy |