|
Application by NHS Trust for permission to undertake invasive, investigative procedures to diagnose whether the patient had cancer and, if necessary, urgent keyhole surgery on a patient who it was agreed lacked capacity.
The patient was in her 60’s and suffers from chronic paranoid schizophrenia. Hayden J allowed the application, partly because the patient had shown resilience in the past, the mental distress caused would be transitory and the treatment, if required, had a good chance of success. Rejecting the evidence of one of the experts involved he concluded that her “premise of a shorter life of better quality as against a longer life of pain and distress is, with respect to her, too absolute”. He also reminded himself at [28] that under the framework of the Mental Capacity Act 2005, there is no constraint on the factors the court should take in to account when considering best interests. Read the judgment on Bailii. |
Case summaries on every Court of Protection case & other relevant decisions with links to the full judgment where available.
Support the Hub
This site is free to access but if you find it useful then please consider a contribution by way of support for our work. Click here to contribute. Sign up for our free email alertWe do not share your details with any third parties and you can unsubscribe at any time
Thank you!You have successfully joined our Court of Protection Hub list. More from Bath PublishingBrowse |
|
This site is published by Bath Publishing Limited
www.bathpublishing.com Manage your email preferences Read the Bath Publishing Privacy Policy |