Application by hospital trust concerning capacity and best interests of RH, who needs treatment for kidney failure but has a form of schizophrenia. RH is 40 years old and currently detained under s3 of the MHA 1983. He has a form of schizophrenia, which is characterised by disorganised behaviour and speech, mood incongruence, hallucinations and delusions. RH has also been diagnosed with declining kidney function which requires surgical intervention. The applicant Trust was seeking orders that RH lacks capacity to make decisions about his treatment and it was in his best interests to undergo the proposed urological surgery under general anaesthesia.
After reviewing the evidence and the relevant law, the judge agrees RH lacks capacity, partly as RH's delusions lead him to think there is nothing wrong with him and the hospital wants to remove his kidneys and kill or harm him. She goes on to accept the care plan is in his best interests as the kidney problem is caused by a blockage and could be cured with a simple incision, a decision made easier as RH's current medication for schizophrenia is proving to be beneficial. Finally the judge comments on the procedural history of the application at [5-14] which had been unhelpful and is described at [78] as 'frenzied'. Read the judgment on the National Archive Comments are closed.
|
Case summaries on every Court of Protection case & other relevant decisions with links to the full judgment where available.
Support the Hub
This site is free to access but if you find it useful then please consider a contribution by way of support for our work. Click here to contribute. Sign up for our free email alertWe do not share your details with any third parties and you can unsubscribe at any time
More from Bath PublishingBrowseCategories
All
Archives
February 2024
|
This site is published by Bath Publishing Limited
www.bathpublishing.com Manage your email preferences Read the Bath Publishing Privacy Policy |