Application by the P's daughter seeking a declaration that it would not be lawful or in her best interests to administer her mother with a vaccine against Covid-19, or indeed, any other vaccine, on the basis that to do so would be contrary both to her best interests and to what the daughter contended would be her wishes.
The P lived in a care home and had done for the last 10 years. All the residents and staff of the care home had received the Covid-19 vaccine but the P's daughter told them that her mother was not to receive it because of the daughter's concerns about the speed at which the vaccine had been developed and approved, amongst others. The court had to decide whether the P should have the vaccine or not.
The court concluded that the risk to the P's life and health, if she were not to have the vaccine, would be unacceptably high and that it was in her best interests to receive it.
Read the full text of the judgment on Bailii.
Comments are closed.
Case summaries on every Court of Protection case & other relevant decisions with links to the full judgment where available.
Support the Hub
This site is free to access but if you find it useful then please consider a contribution by way of support for our work. Click here to contribute.
Sign up for our free email alert
We do not share your details with any third parties and you can unsubscribe at any time
More from Bath Publishing
This site is published by Bath Publishing Limited
Manage your email preferences