Court of Protection Hub
  • Home
  • Resources
  • Cases
  • News & Views
  • About the book
  • About the site

Cases

Re RG [2015] EWCOP 66

26/10/2015

 
The local authority, Northamptonshire County Council (‘LA’) made an application to revoke an Enduring Power of Attorney (‘EPA) in relation to the Patient’s (‘P’) property and affairs and to appoint a professional deputy to manage P’s property and affairs.
The Facts
P was born on 6th February 1933 and is an 82 year old woman who has lived in a residential care home since 20th March 2015.  

P had four children, Gary aged 60 years, Keith born in 1956 but died in 2005, Julian aged 49 years and Lisa aged 47 years.

P executed an EPA in 2005 and she appointed Julian to be her sole attorney.
 
P was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s dementia on 12th February 2015. P has a house worth £140,000 and life savings of £100,000. P has debt of approximately £30,000; this includes the care home fees. The care home fees are £850 per week.

Concerns
The LA received an anonymous phone call that Gary and Julian were selling off P’s personal effects and were planning to let her property. The police were involved but there is no ongoing investigation.

On 1st June 2015 the authorised court officer made an interim order authorising the LA to secure P’s property and change the locks. 

Objections
Julian objected to the application stating that P made an EPA and was submitted to the Office of the Public Guardian (‘OPG’) on 29th May 2015.

The court consolidated the application for an appointment of a deputy with any objections to the registration of the EPA on 3rd July 2015.

On 17th July 2015 the LA made an application to suspend the EPA which had been registered by the OPG on 6th July 2015 and authorising the LA to prevent disposal P’s property pending the decision of the court. An order was duly made.
 
LA’s further concerns
Through a number of witnesses the concerns raised were:
  • Gary and Julian had neglected P’s needs by allowing the home to fall into a poor state of repair and by failing the LA’s recommendations to arrange support and care for P at her home.
  • Gary and Julian moved in with P for a short period but then left her alone with no running hot water and a large dog to take of.
  • If P lived at home with her sons some family members would not visit due to conflict.
Lisa raised concerns on behalf of the LA.  Lisa expressed concerns as to her brothers’ behaviour when Julian and Gary respectively lived with P. Lisa made allegations of drink and aggression.

The Law
The court considered paragraphs 16(4)(g) of Schedule 4 to the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (‘the Act’) for the revocation and cancellation of the registered EPA. The court can cancel the registration of the EPA if it is satisfied having regard to all the circumstances that the attorney is unsuitable to be the P’s attorney. Further if the court directs cancellation of the registration of the EPA, it must order that the power created by the EPA should be revoked.

The court considered Re W (Enduring Power of Attorney) [2003] 3 WLR 45; Re E (Enduring Power of Attorney) [2000] 3 WLR 1974; and Re F [2004] 3 ALL ER 277. The court cited paragraph 284f in Re F:

‘It seems to me that to remove a chosen attorney because of hostility from a sibling or other relative, in the absence of any effective challenge to his competence or integrity, should require clear evidence either that the continuing hostility will impeded the proper administration of the estate or will cause significant distress to the donor which would be avoided by the appointment of a receiver.  Neither of these conditions is satisfied by the evidence in this case.’ 

Decision
The court allowed the LA’s application and revoked the EPA on the ground that Julian is unsuitable to be P’s attorney based on Julian doing nothing or very little, the neglect of P, and the hostility between the family.
 
Discussion
The court accepted that Julian failed to ensure P was provided with the care she needed, even the most basic care, even though he was aware of P’s needs. The court found that P was left for a period without any or appropriate support or care. Julian had left the property leaving P alone despite her deteriorating mental and physical health.

Although P had the funds for private care, and Julian stated that he was happy to arrange it, this never materialised.

The court did not find that Julian disposed of P’s personal effects and did not criticise Julian for attempting to let the property as it was a wise commercial decision.

The judge was critical of Julian as he lacked urgency and was doing the bare minimum and this was not in P’s best interest.

Julian failed to ensure the property was insured. The court reiterated paragraph 1(2)(a) of Schedule 4, which allows an attorney to take steps, pending registration of the EPA, to prevent loss to the estate. Even though P did not insure the property when she had capacity, Julian should have taken steps to insure the property when P lost capacity. 

There was real hostility between Lisa and Gary and although Julian cannot delegate his authority to someone else he appeared to have done so to Gary.

This is another example of where attorneys do not work in the best interests of the P, and another sad example of a bitter relationship between family members that make it difficult, and not in P’s best interest, for the chosen attorney to carry out their functions suitably.

Read the full text of the judgment on Bailii

Comments are closed.
    Case summaries on every Court of Protection case & other relevant decisions with links to the full judgment where available. 

    Support the Hub
    This site is free to access but if you find it useful then please consider a contribution by way of support for our work.  Click here to contribute.

    Sign up for our free email alert

    We do not share your details with any third parties and you can unsubscribe at  any time

    RSS Feed


    More from Bath Publishing


    Browse

    Categories

    All
    Advance Decisions
    Assessments
    Best Interests
    Capacity
    Committal
    Contact
    Contempt Of Court
    Coronavirus
    Costs
    Deputies
    Disclosure
    DNA Testing
    DOLs
    End Of Life Decisions
    Finance
    Gifts
    Habitual Residence
    Human Rights
    Inherent Jurisdiction
    Injunctions
    International
    Jurisdiction
    LPA/EPA
    LPAs
    Medical Treatment
    Personal Welfare
    Practice & Procedure
    Pregnancy & Contraception
    Publicity
    Religion
    Reporting
    Residence
    Settlement
    Sexual Relations
    Statutory Will
    Sterilisation And Termination

    Archives

    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    February 2017
    October 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015


Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Home
  • Resources
  • Cases
  • News & Views
  • About the book
  • About the site