PP  EWCOP 65
Application for the revocation of both LPAs after the attorneys used the Patient's money to buy a property. The LPA PA was revoked, the LPA HW was not.
The Patient's attorneys used some of her money to buy a property after they sought advice on inheritance tax liability. They asked the court to ratify the gift instead of asking the court for permission before using the money. The PG applied to have both LPAs for property and affairs and health and welfare revoked.
The court revoked the LPA PA but not the LPA HW. The court ruled that the attorneys were not acting in the Patient's best interests when they instructed an IFA to make investments whose primary purpose was for the saving of inheritance tax. The attorneys were ordered to pay their own costs and that of the OS (who acted as the Patient's litigation friend), save for £4,000.
Read the full text of the judgment on Bailii
Comments are closed.
Case summaries on every Court of Protection case & other relevant decisions with links to the full judgment where available.
Support the Hub
This site is free to access but if you find it useful then please consider a contribution by way of support for our work. Click here to contribute.
Sign up for our free email alert
We do not share your details with any third parties and you can unsubscribe at any time
More from Bath Publishing