Court of Protection Hub
  • Home
  • Resources
    • Key cases archive
  • Cases
  • News & Views
  • About the book
  • About the site

Cases

IH (Observance of Muslim Practice) [2017] EWCOP 9

12/6/2017

 
​Applications for the Patient not to fast during Ramadan and to have his axillary and pubic hair trimmed in accordance with Islamic cultural and religious practice. First application allowed, second application dismissed.
The Patient is 39 and from a Punjabi family. He has a profound learning disability, and functions intellectually at the developmental level of a 1-3 year old. He also has atypical autism (i.e. his level of mental retardation makes it difficult to elucidate a full house of autistic symptoms). He has the appearance of microcephaly, he has a neurodevelopmental disorder, hemiparesis, a weakness on the right side of his body, myopia, a convergent squint, an intermittent loss of balance and a mood disorder. He is doubly incontinent. He has familiar routines, but is reported not to stick to or depend on routines; he nonetheless likes predictability. He has a short attention span. He is greatly loved by his family, and is popular with his carers. He currently resides in a supported living environment. There were 2 applications before the court:
  1. An application by the OS for a declaration that is was not in the Patient's interests for him to fast during Ramadan
  2. An application by the Patient's father that it was in the Patient's best interests for his axillary and pubic hair to be trimmed in accordance with Islamic cultural and religious practice insofar as it is safe and reasonable to do so.
Dealing with the first application, the application was allowed, the court ruling that it was not in the Patient's best interests for him to be expected to fast during Ramadan, or indeed at all. There is no Islamic obligation on the Patient to fast given his lack of capacity. He has never been required to fast by his family, and has not fasted while in their care. He has not, thus far, fasted while in the care of the Local Authority. The absence of food/water would be likely to cause the Patient stress, or distress; this may cause him to become irritable and/or aggressive, increasing the risks to staff and himself. There is some minor anxiety that fasting and/or mild dehydration would increase the side effects of any one of his multiple medications.

The court dismissed the second application. This procedure is not required of the Patient in accordance with the tenets of the Islamic faith; there is no other benefit to the Patient in undergoing this procedure, which carries avoidable risks of harm to the Patient and/or his carers were he to become stressed in the process.

Read the full text of the judgment on Bailii

Comments are closed.
    Case summaries on every Court of Protection case & other relevant decisions with links to the full judgment where available. 

    Support the Hub
    This site is free to access but if you find it useful then please consider a contribution by way of support for our work.  Click here to contribute.

    Sign up for our free email alert

    We do not share your details with any third parties and you can unsubscribe at  any time

    RSS Feed


    More from Bath Publishing


    Browse

    Categories

    All
    Advance Decisions
    Assessments
    Best Interests
    Capacity
    Committal
    Contact
    Contempt Of Court
    Coronavirus
    Costs
    Deputies
    Disclosure
    DNA Testing
    DOLs
    End Of Life Decisions
    Finance
    Gifts
    Habitual Residence
    Human Rights
    Inherent Jurisdiction
    Injunctions
    International
    Jurisdiction
    LPA/EPA
    LPAs
    Medical Treatment
    Personal Welfare
    Practice & Procedure
    Pregnancy & Contraception
    Publicity
    Religion
    Reporting
    Residence
    Settlement
    Sexual Relations
    Statutory Will
    Sterilisation And Termination

    Archives

    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    February 2017
    October 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015



Picture
This site is published by Bath Publishing Limited
www.bathpublishing.com
Manage your email preferences
Read the Bath Publishing Privacy Policy
  • Home
  • Resources
    • Key cases archive
  • Cases
  • News & Views
  • About the book
  • About the site