Court of Protection Hub
  • Home
  • Resources
    • Key cases archive
  • Cases
  • News & Views
  • About the book
  • About the site

Cases

GN v Newland [2015] EWCOP 43

30/6/2015

 
The original application was made by Julia Newland, a solicitor, and it concerned an application for Julia Newland to be appointed as a Deputy for CN (the Patient) in relation to her property affairs.  The only person to be named as respondents to the application was DN and P’s social worker.

The application came before an authorised court officer (‘ACO’) and the application was granted.

P’s son GN sought review of the decision under Rule 89 of the Court of Protection Rules 2007; and for himself to be appointed P’s deputy.
The Facts
P is 76 years and has four children. CN and her husband came from Jamaica during the 1960s. P took early retirement in 1994 and divorced her husband in 1995.

DN is 57 and is the eldest son who lives in Jamaica, VN is 53 and resides in a residential care home having suffered a stroke at 26 years, DS is 52 and is the only daughter and has not had contact with P for over twenty years, GN is 47 and is the youngest son.

P lives in a former council house which she purchased under the Right to Buy Scheme in 1989. P paid a deposit and used her housing discount. GN raised a mortgage to make up the balance.

CN has Alzheimer’s disease.

Julia Newland was approached by P’s social worker to meet P and become her deputy as P was struggling to pay her bills and deal with her finances.

Concerns
CN sought a review of the decision of the ACO stating the following reasons:
  • He had no notice of the proceedings;
  • The ACO was wrong in law and exceeded his jurisdiction by acting on his own cause in breach of natural justice;
  • The decision maker was possibly biased;
  • The ACO acted beyond the scope of his powers
Proceedings
The court ordered a report by the Court of Protection Visitor under section 49 of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 to ascertain the views of the P regarding, amongst other things, the involvement of her children.

Due to P’s poor current short-term memory some questions were difficult. P was quite clear that she did not want GN involved as he would try and sell her house and the house did not belong to him. P expressed a wish for a cousin to be deputy but he did not wish to. P did not really remember Julia Newland although did state that her face looked familiar. 

The court heard from Julia Newland, the social worker and GN. Julia Newland stated that as for notifying all the children she was aware they had been estranged for several years. Also she was informed that GN had assaulted his mother. She therefore believed that it was inappropriate to include GN in the application and that she was respecting P’s wishes.

During GN’s evidence he asserted that P was violent towards him resulting in him having to move out of the property. Further he was unable to acknowledge that P had a beneficial interest in the property by virtue of the housing discount. 

The Law
The court considered the new rule 7A regarding the court authorising the ACO to exercise the jurisdiction of the court. It also referred to PD3A paragraph 2.1(a) permitting the ACO to deal with applications concerning deputies for property and affairs applications.

The court considered Rule 70 which deals with notification to certain persons in accordance with PD9B.  There is a list of people according to their presumed closeness. The presumption can be displaced and the reasons should be put in the application form.

When making the decision regarding who should be appointed deputy the court in particular considered section 4(2),(4) and (6)(a), in relation to all the relevant circumstances, and the participation of P, and P’s wishes and feelings.

The court further considered Article 12.4 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

Decision
The court was satisfied that Julia Newland acted in accordance with the practice direction and had good reason not to give notice to P’s other three children and the presumption was displaced.

The court found GN’s complaints regarding the ACO were entirely unfounded and unwarranted.

It dismissed GN’s application to be appointed P’s deputy and Julia Newland was retained as P’s deputy. 

Discussion
The court considered it would be failing under domestic and international law if it disregarded P’s rights, will and preferences by appointing GN as her deputy when she had strong views about him having nothing to do with her finances.

The court dismissed GN’s application for three reasons:
  1. He was the bane of P’s life and that P wanted nothing to do with him;
  2. He would be unable to act competently and fairly as he had an interest in the property which was adverse to P’s; GN was unable to see that P had an interest in the property;
  3. It was in P’s best interest for Julia Newland to continue as P’s deputy; no other person was willing or able to act.
This case highlights how important it is to have a good relationship between a family member wishing to be P’s deputy. Where there is a conflict of interest, as there was in this case regarding property rights, and a volatile relationship then it is not going to be in the P’s best interest for that family member to be appointed as a deputy.

Read the full text of the judgment on Bailii


Comments are closed.
    Case summaries on every Court of Protection case & other relevant decisions with links to the full judgment where available. 

    Support the Hub
    This site is free to access but if you find it useful then please consider a contribution by way of support for our work.  Click here to contribute.

    Sign up for our free email alert

    We do not share your details with any third parties and you can unsubscribe at  any time

    RSS Feed


    More from Bath Publishing


    Browse

    Categories

    All
    Advance Decisions
    Assessments
    Best Interests
    Capacity
    Committal
    Contact
    Contempt Of Court
    Coronavirus
    Costs
    Deputies
    Disclosure
    DNA Testing
    DOLs
    End Of Life Decisions
    Finance
    Gifts
    Habitual Residence
    Human Rights
    Inherent Jurisdiction
    Injunctions
    International
    Jurisdiction
    LPA/EPA
    LPAs
    Medical Treatment
    Personal Welfare
    Practice & Procedure
    Pregnancy & Contraception
    Publicity
    Religion
    Reporting
    Residence
    Settlement
    Sexual Relations
    Statutory Will
    Sterilisation And Termination

    Archives

    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    February 2017
    October 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015



Picture
This site is published by Bath Publishing Limited
www.bathpublishing.com
Manage your email preferences
Read the Bath Publishing Privacy Policy
  • Home
  • Resources
    • Key cases archive
  • Cases
  • News & Views
  • About the book
  • About the site