The High Court exercised its inherent jurisdiction and authorised a deprivation of liberty in respect of the capacitous P.
In 2009 the criminal court imposed a hospital order under s.37 together with a restriction order under s.41 of the MHA after the P was convicted of serious sex offences. The P was discharged from hospital in 2016 pursuant to s.73 of the MHA on conditions which included a requirement to comply with his care and risk management plan. The plan, which the P consented to, amounted to a deprivation of his liberty. The court had to decide whether, following judgment in Secretary of State for Justice v MM  UKSC 60 (where the court ruled that the MHA does not permit either the First-tier Tribunal or the Secretary of State to impose conditions amounting to detention or a deprivation of liberty upon a conditionally discharged restricted patient), they could authorise a deprivation of liberty in respect of a capacitous individual.
The court decided it was appropriate to exercise the inherent jurisdiction in respect of the P and, accordingly authorised the deprivation of liberty which arose from the terms of the P’s community care plan for a period of twelve months.
Read the full text of the judgment on Bailii
Case summaries on every Court of Protection case & other relevant decisions with links to the full judgment where available.
Support the Hub
This site is free to access but if you find it useful then please consider a contribution by way of support for our work. Click here to contribute.
Sign up for our free email alert
We do not share your details with any third parties and you can unsubscribe at any time
More from Bath Publishing