Ex-tempore judgment following an application to alter a transparency order The BBC made the application to review the transparency order as part of plans to make a documentary about MC, described by Hayden J as an extremely vulnerable young man. Hayden J also identifies "the real question, as I see it, is whether if this programme were to go ahead involving MC to the circumscribed extent that is contemplated, it could do so without interfering with his Article 8 rights."
After reviewing the legal framework and the evidence from the LA's learning disability psychologist, Hayden J rejects the application. The 'ground rules', as he called them, were unclear and any mitigations suggested during the hearing were insufficient in the light of a plan to publish a voicemail left by MC for his mother. Hayden J found this 'a very significant intrusion on the rights of MC' and concludes at [24] "His participation, however limited, in a programme which will inevitably and no doubt properly contain criticisms of the mental health system, is fraught with danger for MC. That danger is not confined to his immediate situation but risks having an adverse impact on his whole life." Read the judgment on the National Archive Comments are closed.
|
Case summaries on every Court of Protection case & other relevant decisions with links to the full judgment where available.
Support the Hub
This site is free to access but if you find it useful then please consider a contribution by way of support for our work. Click here to contribute. Sign up for our free email alertWe do not share your details with any third parties and you can unsubscribe at any time
More from Bath PublishingBrowseCategories
All
Archives
February 2024
|
This site is published by Bath Publishing Limited
www.bathpublishing.com Manage your email preferences Read the Bath Publishing Privacy Policy |