|
Court of Appeal judgment concerning the legal test to be applied by the Court of Protection when considering an injunction.
Judgment from Mostyn J clarifying points around participation of P, anonymity and the correctness of the standard transparency order.
Application by father of G, his adult daughter, to discharge reporting restrictions in proceedings relating to where she should be cared for when she is discharged from her current placement in a children’s hospital (see also G, Re [2021] EWCOP 69)
Judgment concerning whether the public should be admitted to the Court of Protection proceedings concerning P and whether this judgment should be published.
Application by a daughter (WU), as representative for other family members, seeking orders that their mother (BU) lacks capacity to make decisions about her contact, restricting contact with another man and for a forced marriage protection order to be put in place.
Application to prevent publication of a video of a patient, P, in her treating hospital. The application was granted.
This judgment relates to the reasons of Theis J for granting a time limited extension for a reporting restriction order (‘RRO’).
The application was made out of hours on 2nd December 2015, concluding just before 10pm. |
Case summaries on every Court of Protection case & other relevant decisions with links to the full judgment where available.
Support the Hub
This site is free to access but if you find it useful then please consider a contribution by way of support for our work. Click here to contribute. Sign up for our free email alertWe do not share your details with any third parties and you can unsubscribe at any time
Thank you!You have successfully joined our Court of Protection Hub list. More from Bath PublishingBrowseCategories
All
Archives
August 2025
|
|
This site is published by Bath Publishing Limited
www.bathpublishing.com Manage your email preferences Read the Bath Publishing Privacy Policy |